P1680-15 - Geisinger Orthopaedic Institute Shoulder and Elbow Course
06/20/2015

Geisinger Employee:
Evaluate each presentation
Scale: 5=Excellent 4=Very Good 3=Good 2=Fair 1=Poor
Using the above scale, please rate the following:
Did Not Attend Amount & Depth of Material Relevance of Topic Organization & Effectiveness of Delivery Free of Commercial Bias Presenting Balanced View
Reverse TSA the Advantages of a Lateral Center of Rotation (Jonathan Levy, MD)
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
YES NO
Mid to Long Term Results in Reverse TSA (C. Scott Humphrey, MD)
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
YES NO
Management of Humeral Bone Loss in Reverse TSA (Samer Hasan, MD)
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
YES NO
Management of Glenoid Bone Loss in Reverse TSA (Edward McFarland, MD)
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
YES NO
Who Does Well & Who Doesn’t do Well with Reverse TSA (G. Dean Harter, MD)
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
YES NO
Infections in Shoulder Arthroplasty (Matthew Ramsey, MD)
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
YES NO
Periprosthetic Fractures in Shoulder Arthroplasty (G. Dean Harter, MD)
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
YES NO
Prevention of Scapula Notching (Matthew Walker, MD)
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
YES NO
Acromial Fractures in Reverse TSA (Jonathan Levy, MD)
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
YES NO
Lessons Learned - Mistakes I’ve made Over the Years (Matthew Ramsey, MD & Andrew Green, MD)
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
YES NO
The Dislocated Reverse TSA (Mark Mighell, MD)
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
YES NO
Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty (G. Dean Harter, MD)
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
YES NO
Complex Case Presentations (Edward McFarland, MD)
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
YES NO
TSA in the Young Patient (Andrew Green, MD)
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
YES NO
10 Tips to Glenoid Exposure (Joseph Abboud, MD)
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
YES NO
Glenoid Design in TSA (Samer Hasan, MD)
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
YES NO
Technical Pearls to Improve Outcomes in Anatomical TSA (C. Scott Humphrey, MD)
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
YES NO
Rehab in Shoulder Arthroplasty (G. Dean Harter, MD)
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
YES NO
Alternative Bearing Surfaces in Shoulder Arthroplasty (Jack E. Kazanjian, DO)
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
YES NO
Neurological Complications in Shoulder Arthroplasty (Joseph Abboud, MD)
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
YES NO
Orthopaedic Efficiency: How to Make it Happen (G. Dean Harter, MD)
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
YES NO
How to Talk to a Patient about a Bad Result (Andrew Green, MD)
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
YES NO
Closing Statements (G. Dean Harter, MD)
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
YES NO

What personal level of understanding or ability did you have related to the learning objectives both BEFORE and AFTER you attended this event?
Indicate your response using a rating scale where:
1 = Almost No Understanding/Ability
2 = Little Understanding/Ability
3 = Moderate Understanding/Ability
4 = High Understanding/Ability
5 = Very High Understanding/Ability
Objective Before Event After Event
discuss recent modalities utilized to evaluate patients with shoulder pain
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
explain the etiology of failed instability repairs
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
describe techniques to prevent complications of reverse TSA
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
apply algorithm to provide appropriate care for patients with simple and complex elbow instability
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
employ surgical approach options to improve exposure to various elbow fractures
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5

Overall Evaluation Strongly Agree -> Strongly Disagree
The content of this educational activity met my expectations.
5 4 3 2 1
Format enhanced achievement of program objectives.
5 4 3 2 1
Level of material was appropriate for me.
5 4 3 2 1
There was adequate educational interactivity.
5 4 3 2 1
Information presented will be useful in my practice.
5 4 3 2 1
Resources provided were useful.
5 4 3 2 1
Change in my knowledge as a result of this program.
5 4 3 2 1
Site was conducive to learning.
5 4 3 2 1